To Whom It May Concern at Continental Airlines,

First, our compliments: we have always enjoyed the travel experience and customer service of Continental Airlines.  We use your branded credit cards and try to steer purchasing decisions towards Continental whenever possible.  Your seats are comfortable, your entertainment systems are exceptional, your connections to Houston from Phoenix are plentiful, and everything was made better by your recent admission to the Star Alliance.

Our primary stress with Continental revolves around baggage policies covering international flights (and domestic connections) to Brazil.  We understand that flights to and from Brazil can check bags with no over-weight penalties up to 70 lbs.  This is an extremely valuable service for us as the extra 20 lbs across two pieces of luggage can eliminate the need to check a third bag for extended travels.  

While in the end we have had no problems checking bags with these policies, it is not without effort.  We now budget for additional check-in time at the airport to successfully negotiate to these rules with the distrustful service agents.  Even the telephone agents struggle with our questions: if we call customer service three times to confirm the baggage exceptions for Brazil, we will get three different responses.  If we call the Portuguese speaking customer service line, we can get consistent advice (presumably because they frequently assist Brazilian travelers), but even they struggle to point to clear web documentation.

Which brings me to our most important concern, and the solution to our frustrations: please remedy the inconsistent and lacking baggage documentation on your web site.

Let’s review the confusion, item by item, starting with the web page at http://www.continental.com/web/en-US/content/travel/baggage/checkbag.aspx

It starts off strong, clearly documenting the exceptional baggage fee policy:

However, immediately below we run into our first issue in the fees table, which shows Hawaii, Brazil, and Japan as exceptions, but only the Hawaii and Japan exceptions are documented:

Moving to the page http://www.continental.com/web/en-US/content/travel/baggage/excess.aspx, we see references to exceptional policies for Brazil regarding the number of bags that can be checked, but nothing on the weight policies.

The primary baggage page at http://www.continental.com/web/en-US/content/travel/baggage/check.aspx clarifies little else.

About.com (http://airtravel.about.com/od/luggageandpackingadvice/a/cobags.htm) makes a pretty clear explanation about the Brazil baggage policies: 

By comparison, the United Airlines web site is very clear:

http://www.united.com/page/article/0,6867,52482,00.html#intl

As is American Airlines:

http://www.aa.com/i18n/travelInformation/baggage/baggageAllowance.jsp#Dimensi...

And finally, Delta:

http://www.delta.com/traveling_checkin/baggage/excess_baggage/index.jsp

Our request to you is to clearly document the baggage policies for flights to Brazil, as the written documentation is in conflict with the policies we receive from customer service agents both at the airport and on the phone.  Your major competitors document this clearly, including other Star Alliance members, and we humbly ask that you do the same.

Sincerely,

Brad Corrion

·         Gaping hole: EMV Chip+PIN vulnerable to man in the middle attacks.  Translation: millions of European card holders at risk of card fraud (that to the bank’s eye doesn’t look like fraud) http://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2010/02/11/chip-and-pin-is-broken/

·         E2E and tokenization increase security but do not decrease scope, unless “if, and only if, it has been validated that the entity that possesses encrypted cardholder data does not have the means to decrypt it.” “Once the cardholder data is encrypted or tokenized, and so long as the merchant never has the ability to retrieve clear text data, all the downstream systems could be out of scope. Otherwise, all bets are off and all your cardholder data are in scope. You may have improved your security, but you have not reduced your PCI scope.” http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/securityfraud/security-versus-scope-choose-one/

·         Visa increases the number of merchant categories eligible for “no signature for $25 or less”, decreasing tender time for cash heavy discount merchants http://www.paymentsnews.com/2010/02/visa-extends-no-signature-required-to-additional-merchant-categories.html

·         Dutch retailers expecting to go cashless in five years http://babelfish.yahoo.com/translate_url?doit=done&tt=url&intl=1&fr=bf-home&trurl=http://www.nu.nl/economie/2180145/contant-geld-verdwijnt.html&lp=nl_en&btnTrUrl=Translate

·         NEC using facial database to estimate age of customer to within 10 years http://www.storefrontbacktalk.com/crm/nec-using-hair-color-ear-shape-to-help-digital-signage-guess-consumers-age/

Highlight the virtual machine, wait for the summary screen to refresh and you will see a USB icon above the Tasks and Events tabs.

Just when I thought I was narrowing in on a Canon body...

Canon EOS 550D vs EOS 500D Key differences